从巅峰到衰落
13世纪:Scholasticism at peak——
Aquinas、Albertus、Scotus——
Systematic、rigorous、confident
综合Aristotle和Christianity——
建立impressive intellectual edifices
但14-15世纪:
System开始crack——
Confidence wane——
新的voices challenge旧的certainties
什么happened?
内部tensions
1. Via moderna vs Via antiqua
两条道路的split:
Via antiqua(古代道路):
- Realism about universals
- Thomist或Scotist
- Traditional metaphysics
- Confidence in reason
Via moderna(现代道路):
- Nominalism(Ockham)
- Skepticism about metaphysics
- Emphasis on上帝’s absolute power
- Limits of reason
Universities变成战场——
Two camps互相攻击
Instead of unified system——
有competing schools:
- Thomists(Dominicans)
- Scotists(Franciscans)
- Ockhamists
- Averroists(despite condemnations)
Proliferation of positions——
Decrease in consensus
2. 信仰与理性的分离加深
Aquinas:faith和reason harmonious
但Ockham和followers:
理性’s reach=much more limited
Many theological truths:
- 不可证明by reason
- 只能accept by faith
这不是reject reason——
但sharp separation of domains:
Philosophy=one thing
Theology=另一thing
Less integration
3. 过度subtlety
Later scholastics有时:
Obsessed with细微distinctions——
Endless subdivisions——
Debates over trivialities
Lost sight of big questions
Critics(especially humanists)mock:
“How many angels can dance on pin’s head?”
(Probably unfair——
Scholastics可能never真正debate this——
但symbolizes perceived absurdity)
4. Lack of innovation
By 15世纪:
Often just repeat earlier authorities——
Aquinas、Scotus、Ockham——
Commentary on commentary on commentary
Less original思考
System成为ossified(僵化)
外部挑战
1. Black Death(1347-1353)
Plague kill约1/3 of Europe人口
Massive social disruption:
- Universities closed temporarily
- Scholars died
- Economic crisis
- Psychological trauma
也是intellectual crisis:
如果上帝是good和just——
为什么允许这catastrophe?
Theodicy(辩神论)问题acute
某些turn to:
- Mysticism(direct experience of上帝)
- Apocalypticism(world ending)
- Skepticism
Confidence in rational theology shaken
2. Great Schism(1378-1417)
Two(later three)rival Popes——
Each claiming legitimacy
如果Church’s highest authority divided——
How trust其interpretations?
Conciliar movement:
Councils>Pope?
Challenge hierarchical authority
也challenge以Church为中心的知识观
3. Hundred Years’ War(1337-1453)
France和England长期conflict
Constant warfare:
- 破坏
- Resources drain
- Nationalism rise
大学often caught in politics
Paris university=pro-French
Oxford=pro-English
Philosophy politicized
4. Rise of vernacular languages
Increasingly,writing in vernacular——
不只是Latin:
- Dante(Italian)
- Chaucer(English)
- German mystics
Latin=学者专属language——
Vernacular=broader audience
但also:fragment的international scholarly community
5. Early humanism
14世纪开始:
Petrarch和others:
对scholasticism不满:
Criticize:
- Barbarous Latin
- Obsession with logic-chopping
- Ignore classical literature
- Dry、technical
Prefer:
- Classical sources直接
- Rhetoric over logic
- Eloquence
- Moral philosophy over metaphysics
这是new intellectual style——
将dominate Renaissance
思想转变
1. Nominalism的影响
Ockham’s nominalism spread:
只有individuals exist——
Universals=mental constructs
Impact:
A. Metaphysics的collapse
如果no real universals、forms、essences——
Traditional metaphysics loses foundation
B. Empiricism的seeds
Knowledge must be based on experience of particulars——
不是speculation about universals
C. Science的方向
Focus on observation、particulars——
不是deduction from first principles
D. 个体主义
Individuals=primary reality——
This feeds later individualism(political、ethical)
2. 怀疑论的增长
Nicholas of Autrecourt(14世纪):
Medieval skeptic——
Question:我们能确定know什么?
Beyond immediate experience和logic——
Little can be proven
Even causation不是demonstrable
(Anticipates Hume!)
结论:
Faith≠reducible to reason
Theology≠science
3. Mysticism的appeal
在理性’s limits变clear时——
许多turn to mystical experience:
- Eckhart
- Rhineland mystics
- Women mystics(我们昨天讲)
直接experience of上帝——
Bypass complex rational theology
个人、内在、non-institutional
4. Voluntarism**
Emphasis on will(上帝’s和human)——
Over intellect
上帝’s free will=absolute——
可以command differently
Morality more contingent——
Less based on necessary rational truths
Human will also emphasized——
Freedom、choice
这feeds later Protestant emphasis on will、grace
Conciliarism和Church authority
争论:
Who has ultimate authority in Church?
Pope(traditional view)
vs
Council(conciliarists)
Background:Great Schism混乱
Council of Constance(1414-1418):
End schism通过deposing rival Popes——
Elect new one
这suggest:Council>Pope?
Thinkers like Jean Gerson、Pierre d’Ailly argue:
Church=community of faithful——
Council代表community——
Can judge even Pope
这是proto-democratic思想——
在ecclesiastical context
但最终:
Papacy reassert authority
Conciliarism失败
但idea of popular sovereignty planted
经院哲学的遗产
虽然decline——
Scholasticism留下lasting legacy:
1. Method
Rigorous argumentation——
Systematic organization——
Careful distinction
这些remain ideals in philosophy
2. Questions
许多问题首次precisely formulated:
- Universals
- Causation
- Free will vs determinism
- Faith vs reason
- Infinity
- Time
Later philosophers continue engage这些
3. Institutions
Universities——
Scholasticism创建的——
Continue as centers of learning
Structure(faculties、degrees)persist
4. Integration
Attempt to synthesize:
- Ancient philosophy(Aristotle)
- Christian theology
- Science
虽然synthesis eventually break apart——
Ambition影响later思想家
5. Language
Technical philosophical Latin——
Vocabulary developed by scholastics——
Used by later philosophers(even non-scholastic)
过渡到Renaissance
不是sharp break——
而是gradual transition:
15世纪:
Scholasticism仍在universities teach——
但alongside:
- Humanism
- Renewed Platonism
- Mysticism
- New science
某些figures bridge两个时代:
Nicholas of Cusa(明天会讲):
- Scholastic training
- But mystical、Platonic turn
- Interest in mathematics、cosmos
Continuity和change并存
为什么衰落?
Summary of factors:
内部:
- Schools之间conflicts
- 过度subtlety
- Loss of creativity
- 信仰-理性separation
外部:
- Black Death、wars、schism(社会危机)
- Humanism(intellectual rival)
- Vernacular rise(language shift)
- New learning from East(Greek texts)
但also:
Natural evolution——
任何intellectual movement——
Eventually exhaust possibilities——
新questions、new methods needed
现代视角
1. Cycles in思想史
Pattern repeats:
创新→system-building→elaboration→ossification→reaction
我们在other movements也看到:
- Enlightenment→Romanticism
- Logical positivism→后分析哲学
- Structuralism→post-structuralism
Scholasticism的arc=example of这pattern
2. Integration的挑战
Reconciling different knowledge sources——
(Aristotle、Bible、experience)——
永远是challenge
现代:
How integrate science、religion、philosophy?
仍struggle with这
3. Specialization的dangers
Scholasticism变得too technical、insular——
Lost broader audience
现代academic philosophy sometimes similar:
Technical、专业化——
与public discourse disconnect
Humanist批评of scholasticism——
Echoes in批评of contemporary philosophy
4. Institutions的惯性
Universities、established schools——
有tendency toward conservatism——
Resist change
革新often来自outside或margins
这在今天also true
实践意义
1. 警惕僵化
任何system、method——
可能become ossified——
Lose original vitality
需要:
- Periodic renewal
- Openness to critique
- Willingness to evolve
2. Balance specialization和accessibility
Deep expertise important——
但不应lose connection to:
- Broader questions
- Public understanding
- Practical wisdom
Scholastics at best=both
At worst=only technical
3. Integrate diverse sources
Don’t rely on single authority或tradition——
Like scholastics综合Aristotle、theology——
今天:综合science、philosophy、diverse cultures
4. Recognize limits
Later scholastics学到:
理性有limits——
不是everything可证明
Some mysteries remain
这是humility——
Valuable today
经院哲学的黄昏——
不是simple failure故事——
而是complex transformation:
From one mode of思考——
To another
它的confidence——
在synthesis、system、reason——
终于crack
给way to:
New uncertainties、
New questions、
New approaches
但它教gave us——
Rigor、
Precision、
Courage to ask hard questions
这legacy——
仍在
每次我们:
Make careful distinction——
Build systematic argument——
Seek to reconcile different truths——
我们echo
Those medieval masters——
在他们的cells、
By candlelight、
Wrestling with永恒的questions
虽然他们的answers——
No longer satisfy us——
他们的method、
他们的seriousness、
他们的dedication to truth——
Remain
模范